wide range of issues, from the Irish wool trade and the suppression of piracy, to the treatment of the poor in England and the governance of the colonies. If one rejects the historicity of states of nature, one may still find them a useful analytical device. But what kind of Christian was Locke? This is one of the main reasons why civil society is an improvement on the state of nature. Ruth Grant has persuasively argued that the establishment of government is in effect a two step process. Locke probably holds some version of the representational theory of perception, though some scholars dispute this.
There are many versions of natural rights theory and the social contract in seventeenth and eighteenth century European political philosophy, some conservative and some radical. In the early 1660s he can i write an essay in a day very likely was an orthodox Anglican. But these analogies may not get us very far in grasping the necessary connections between qualities in nature. We should, Locke also suggests, be tolerant of differing opinions as we have more reason to retain the opinions we have than to give them up to strangers or adversaries who may well have some interest in our doing. But he adds: And I do not see how they can argue with anyone or even convince a gainsayer who uses the same plea, without setting down strict boundaries between faith and reason. As we have reached one of the important concepts in Book III, let us turn to that Book and Lockes discussion of language.